Thursday, January 27, 2011

You CAN Edit Yourself

Anyone who caught my twitter feed early Sunday morning saw me ranting about this. But honestly, I'm not done. So here I go!

Over the weekend, I went to a talk where the speaker advised everyone to hire an editor--that the ONLY way to make it in the publishing industry was to hire out help, and that they'd never ever possibly get anywhere (get an agent or become a bestseller) without doing so.

Hiring an editor is a very personal decision and I do believe there are a few instances why you might want to hire one.

But to be told that you HAVE to HIRE an editor, that to get an agent you HAVE to PAY someone, that as a writer you CAN'T EDIT yourself or see your own mistakes and that a writers group isn't enough??!?!?

I practically fell out of my seat. I never heard such wrong information in my life.

Here's the thing, You NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER HAVE to hire an editor! EVER!

Is editing easy? NO! Not at first. But can it be learned? Hell yes it can, and in fact it SHOULD be learned by every writer out there. Editing is a part of the Writing Craft. If you want to master your craft, you have to strive to master every part of it and that includes editing.

Your book is your art, your passion, your creative outlet, your story, your reason for being, your purpose, and so many other things (insert your own word here). You had the idea, you plotted the story, you slaved away writing late into the night day after day getting to know YOUR characters. So WHY on earth would you then pay someone to edit it for you when you don't know this person, don't know if they understand you, aren't necessarily legit and you can (if you're willing to try) do it yourself?

Painters don't draw their images onto a canvas and then hire someone else to come in and paint by numbers.

Dancers don't spend hours upon hours in rehearsal and then have the understudy bow at the end and receive the applause.

Actors don't earn their roles in movies and then hire someone else to do voice overs.

Artists live in their art from start to finish. And writers aren't any different.

As a writer working towards getting an agent, you should have a vital role in every step of your process and the ability to complete your own process. Writing is a craft, and editing is a part of the craft, which means if you want to master your craft, you'd better learn that part of it too.

Do dancers get critiqued and study other dancers? Sure. Painters study other painters and get critiques from them and from their teachers all the time. So do actors. And so do writers. I'm not suggesting writing is a solo process--it's def not and I wouldn't be where I am right now if it weren't for all the people who write with me, critique for me, advise me and teach me.

The difference is, I don't pay them, I'm not dependent on them (in the way that's being suggested above). I CAN edit myself, I do get a feeling when something is off in my draft, and I CAN tell when I need to do something over or better. Sure, its nice when Agent Laura tells me what's wrong--she's an expert on that. But it's not her book (as much as she loves it)--it's mine. At the end of the day, I need to be the number one champion of my own work and able to work on it from any stage and at any angle.

I would be SO cautious of anyone who tells you that you MUST hire an editor to get ahead. You never HAVE to, and I can tick off a very long list of writer friends who have agents and never paid anyone to edit for them--and many now have editors at publishing houses who pay them.

I do believe all writers should read books on editing. I think all writers should learn the art of self-editing. And I highly recommend joining a critique group and finding critique partners. I don't for a second think that anyone with the passion and drive to be a writer is incapable of learning how to be their own editor (BEFORE you get an awesome editor at a major publishing house). If you want to be a writer, you will be a writer, and if you want to master your craft, you WILL do it, and you WILL find an agent and get published if you keep working at it and keep bringing passion to the table.

But why might you hire an editor?

  • When you've done ALL you can. You've read the books, self edited, shown your book to CPs and you would just feel really comfortable if you had a pro do the final once over. I can understand that, especially right before you query, you want to make its perfect times ten. And if that's what you really need to feel comfortable, then go for it.
  • When you know that you learn best by example and seeing someone else edit your work is what it will take for you to learn how to self-edit your work. The more I have my work critiqued by my CPs and work with edits from my agency, the more I am learning the craft of editing--so I can def see the benefit to this. In this way, I'd see hiring the editor as more of a teacher.
  • When you know the person who will do the editing--either you know them personally, or they come with reliable recommendations--and you really feel you need a final touch up. I wouldn't jump blindly into this--check out Editors and Predators to be safe.

I'm sure there are other reasons that I can't think of. I never hired one, so I'm not an expert. But I hope you got this from my rant--editing can be done on a situational basis. But its not ever something you don't have a choice over.

Why NOT to hire an editor:

  • Someone says you have to
  • You don't feel like editing
  • You don't think you should have to edit (you're the talent, not the technical one)

If anyone ever tells you, you HAVE to do this, please know that's not the truth. You CAN do this on your own, and its totally your choice to have help or to go solo. At the end of the day writers make the best editors, and if you absolutely need to have one, okay, but if you don't want to hire one, you can still land your dream agent anyway. If your CPs aren't helping you get you draft into tip top shape, you probably need different CPs. It's all a process that can take time, but if you stick with it, I know it works! Why waste money on a simple solution that has no positive correlation with your successful outcome? You got to work for this, and if you do, I really do believe it'll pay off in the end.

Rant, over.

15 comments:

  1. Hi Frankie *waves* It's been a long time since I visited your neck of the woods but I'm loving the background and I'm loving this topic!!!

    You're right. This is very much a personal decision and you need to take it upon yourself to decide what's best for you. There are several authors who edited within an inch of their life before snagging themselves an agent. They did it alone... they didn't pay someone to do it.

    That's how I operated, I edit until I can't anymore. I pass it along to critique partners, beta readers and let them tear it apart. Then I look at it once more, then ship it off. It's a process. If I paid someone to edit my work it would only be money coming out of my pocket each time. For me it's just easier (and cheaper) to work through the mistakes myself so in the future hiring an editor wouldn't be needed!

    Happy Thursday!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Awesome post.

    I do the whole self-editing method. It's hard when you are just starting out, but each time I learn more. I edit until it feels like my eyes will bleed. I let my CPs and beta readers tear it apart. Then I edit again. Like Jen said, hiring an editor is money from my pocket. This way, I can buy more books. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I actually joined in your conversation on Twitter on this one and it actually makes ALOT of sense when you put it into the context of this blog post.

    One of my best friends is an editor, BUT I also use her as a critique partner. Having a critique partner who is trained as an editor helps when she can point out the things that I don't see and it's helped me alot to self-edit when she makes neat little style sheets...or tells me that I've spelled my characters name wrong...more than once.

    I can't believe someone would say that you HAVE to have an editor BEFORE you get an agent. That's crazy. I talked to one agent who told me that she took on a client who had a MS that was full of errors, but she LOVED the story, so she took him on as a client.

    Okay...I've talked to much now. Magan out.

    ReplyDelete
  4. i approve of this rant. Seriously, if i had heard that i would have scoffed. But then i would have gotten worried and then depressed, becasue hiring an editor is not cheap.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Jen, HI! *waves back* Thanks for the thoughtful comment, I completely agree! I'm all for saving your own money--seriously! Plus every time you do it, you learn it, and get better at it, and paying someone else do it for you is really robbing you of a valuable tool that you deserve to have at your disposal.

    @Lindsay, YES! And good point!!! I'd so rather spend my money on books and support the industry I am a part of then someone else who doesn't necessarily have my best interests at heart. I'd rather self-edit and expand my library.

    @Magan, HI! Yes, I remember, thanks for tweeting with me:-) And oooh having a CP who is trained as an editor is the BEST!!! One of my CPs does freelance editing and she has taught me SO much. She comments now that she hardly has to comment because I've absorbed so much of her knowledge. And also that's true about agents--they work on love and passion for a book, not one that is technically perfect.

    @Sarah Thank you! And yeah, it is NOT cheap, and honestly you shouldn't HAVE to spend any money to break into this field. Because its EASY to do on your own with books and conferences and all sorts of things that ARE worth the money.

    Thanks guys for all the insightful feedback:D

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm picturing this rant holding a sugar bottle...

    I completely agree! I think in anything we try to accomplish, no matter the task, there is always going to something that we either don't like to do or is more challenging for us. But, that doesn't mean we can't do whatever it is. I hate editing, and I admit, I'm not the best at it, but I try my best. And each time I get something back from a CP, I learned something new to the process which I tuck away and use the next time I edit. It may take me a bit longer to get to the query process, but it will happen eventually- and not by hiring someone else.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Kelly, Haha! And seriously, when you do get to the query process and you know all your hard work is paying off its SO much more rewarding!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm with Kelly. You must post a sugar bottle with it.
    Totally agree with you. I've been learning non-stop and still want to learn more. All my work is my "baby". :) I want it to be from me not someone else. Yes, I hate it and yes, it is taking me forever, but in the end (I think and hope ) it will be worth it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Well said.

    Sometimes this industry is complicated enough without novice writers having to sift through the half-truthes and urban myths surrounding it.

    Thanks for putting this out there.

    :-)

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Agreed. There are plenty of editing options available and nobody should be forced into hiring an editor. First of all, who is to say the person you pay is necesaarily going to provide you with the best feedback? But since you did hire them, you might feel inclined to go with their suggestions. I'm a huge fan of critique groups. I'm also a fan of compling what I call a diverse "editing team." I select people with an extensive background or expertise in a specific area relevant to the book. Of course this is not all I do, but it helps me start identifying what isn't working. There are plenty of places to go for honest feedback.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This is an excellent post! You make some really great points here. There are a lot of opportunities for your work to be edited without spending a lot of money on just a single "professional". I agree with Paul; critique groups definitely help writers get feedback from a lot of different people, as well as support.

    Personally, I like to edit for myself. But when I feel like I've done everything I could, I let a close family member or friend (or both) look over my work as well because sometimes there are just some things that you are never able to catch by yourself.

    ~TRA

    http://xtheredangelx.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  13. But...what about the three-eyed baby? I WANTED TO HEAR ABOUT THE THREE-EYED BABY!!!

    ;)

    And pretty much yes to the rest of it. *high fives*

    ReplyDelete
  14. Every writer should learn to edit. The work can only get cleaner and stronger the more the writer understands the process. And there is so much information available online and in print books about how to revise, rewrite, edit.
    I'm a fan of crit groups and beta readers. It's a sharing venture, give-and-take and learn together. My own writing has gotten sooooo much better through this method.
    Hiring an editor should be reserved for people who can't seem to pick up the skills needed or who feel the need to get professional help and learn from it.
    I agree with you that nobody should tell writers they have to hire an editor to make it. Sheesh.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Thank you for your rant! The timing of it couldn't have been better since I was just sitting here dreading all of the editing I had, once again, scheduled (for myself) to do today. I'm just starting out and have been given conflicting advice about absolutely EVERYTHING in this business. My head is spinning! Happy to know I can count on you for a reality check. Oh, and BTW, I have a daughter named Frankie so I am a little more inclined to trust the advice given by someone with that name... LOL

    ReplyDelete

Thank you so much for reading and commenting! Your comments make my day and I love reading them.